Tell me about the fee

I read the news, looked zhzhurnaly went out into the street we live on the other end of the country, thousands of people chase cars, tens of thousands of infrastructural linked to this business, but only when something happens Vladik. If it's duties, this should cause unrest not only in one city. Or am I wrong? .

Another point - do not pay for the car peregonschik, the buyer pays for it. Choice of the buyer does not, he will still pay as much as say. Price, even with an increase in fees will not make the fence and do not move to the Kalina. And with the crisis began to buy less of any vehicle. T. e. ultimately peregonschik does not suffer, he will still receive their. And I must say, who drove - he continues to carry. And chhat his duties. For all pay someone who wants to get this car. Or am I again not in a theme?.

The comments zhzhyuzerov I see fewer and fewer car theme, and another more. I do not want to understand who is to blame for such attitudes. Do not want to believe that all the trolls who skillfully used the public opinion, turning it into his side. But the car is not important in this issue. Vlad is used as a bargaining chip to influence the Kremlin. The Kremlin is resisting as best he can - unfortunately, 93rd year, has not become a lesson for anyone. My question is: who benefits and need?.

Yes, I believe that both sides of the trigger and blow off each other. And that lose from this situation, everything - it is obvious. Whoever is behind the conflict - or rather, for his pickup and untwisting ( it broke out there by itself - it is understandable), he will soon emerge. I think that this point does not have to wait so long. Follow the news on CNN and BBC.

What is my opinion on the matter is the car? . I do not like. honestly. We were going to buy a car. 14,500 bucks, Dodge Stratus. The following year, this car will not cost so much. It is a pity. But I still buy a car ( when I will be able to ) the one that I want. And the price hikes on auto I remember in the past few years and not once, but then something no one did not express dissatisfaction with such rapid.

What is my opinion on the politics of protectionism? . But it is a natural consequence of the ongoing process of gradual nationalization of private property. And the protection of their property by whatever measures - is a natural process for any market. If the owner is a lever that allows you to reduce possible competition - he uses it. If you own the market, and a pair of affiliated shops on it, then you would not let him those traders who sell the same and cheaper - and broke a short time.

Read about Singapore, by the way, there is an interesting situation with the importation of cars into the country.

P. S. specifically for Bournisien: I totally agree with some A. Lebedev - right-hand drive cars in Russia has nothing to do.